Page 23 - UCP_Template01_Sample
P. 23
20 chapter five
1 or at least the preferences of an important faction within that coalition.
2 In a related story, Barry Friedman (2009) and Jeffrey Rosen (2006) have
3 argued that most high Court decisions— across the full range of issues
4 and the full scope of the Court’s history— are consistent with national
5 public opinion.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
UCP_Fischel_FM.indd 20 Achorn International 05/21/2009 02:08PM UCP_Fischel_FM.indd 21 Achorn International 05/21/2009 02:08PM
