Page 21 - UCP_Template01_Sample
P. 21

1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8                 four
  9
  10                Are Judges Tyrants?
  11
  12
  13                    s I note in the previous chapter, federal judicial nominees regularly
  14               Adescribe  the job  for which they  are nominated  as a modest one.
  15                Umpiring is important to the game of baseball, but as John Roberts noted
  16                in 2005, “[n]obody ever went to a ball game to see the umpire.”  So also
                                                                         1
  17                with judging. It is vitally important to the fair and efficient operation of
  18                our political and economic systems; to note just one example, a central
  19                achievement of modern democratic state- building was to enable private
  20                contract disputes to be resolved by a neutral third party rather than a
  21                contest of force. But like umpiring, judging best takes place in the back-
  22                ground rather than at the center of public attention.
  23                  Partisan elected officials sometimes echo this narrative, but only when
  24                describing judges who share their partisan affiliation or ideological pref-
  25                erences. When describing judges and judicial nominees with whom they
  26                disagree, partisan officials tell a very different story. When the Senate
  27                Judiciary Committee held hearings in January 2006 on President George
  28                W. Bush’s nomination of Samuel Alito as associate justice of the United
  29                States, Democratic senator Charles Schumer observed that Alito’s record
  30                on the Third Circuit, where he had sat for fifteen years, revealed a remark-
  31                ably consistent pattern of conservative votes. Recalling the image that
  32                Roberts had deployed so successfully the year before, Senator Schumer
  33                noted that “[i]f the record showed that an umpire repeatedly called 95
  34                percent of pitches strikes when one team’s players were up and repeatedly
  35                called 95 percent of pitches balls when the other team’s players were up,
  36                one would naturally ask whether the umpire was being impartial and fair.”
  37                Referring to United States v. Rybar (3d Cir. 1996)— a case I examined in
  38                chapter 2, in which Judge Alito had voted to strike down the federal ban
  39                on possession of machine guns— Schumer asked the nominee whether he











                  UCP_Fischel_FM.indd              18                                         Achorn International                          05/21/2009  02:08PM  UCP_Fischel_FM.indd              19                                         Achorn International                          05/21/2009  02:08PM
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26